Comparação: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Prémio

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Médio-alto

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Baixo custo

4. Barum Polaris 5 Baixo custo

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Barum Polaris 5 76

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

4. Barum Polaris 5 13x

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

4. Barum Polaris 5 9.

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

4. Barum Polaris 5 26.

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. Barum Polaris 5 2023

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Extremamente positivo

2. Barum Polaris 5 Bom

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfatório

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfatório

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfatório

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfatório

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Condicionalmente recomendada

4. Barum Polaris 5 Suficiente

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

86%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

79%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

71%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 82%

3. Barum Polaris 5 71%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 87%

4. Barum Polaris 5 81%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Barum Polaris 5 81%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 62%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

3. Barum Polaris 5 67%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 66%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

68%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

4. Barum Polaris 5 55%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

4. Barum Polaris 5 71%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

62%

Barum
Polaris 5

61%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 97%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 61%

4. Barum Polaris 5 55%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

4. Barum Polaris 5 56%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Barum Polaris 5 73%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 60%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

4. Barum Polaris 5 46%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

3. Barum Polaris 5 73%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 59%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Barum Polaris 5 C

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Barum
Polaris 5

87%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

83%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

71%

1. Barum Polaris 5 79%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 67%

1. Barum Polaris 5 91%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

1. Barum Polaris 5 92%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 92%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Barum Polaris 5 E

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Barum
Polaris 5

65%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

3. Barum Polaris 5 69%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 69%

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

4. Barum Polaris 5 61%

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85.2%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%