Comparação: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Prémio

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Prémio

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Prémio

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Médio-alto

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Médio-alto

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Extremamente positivo

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Extremamente positivo

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Extremamente positivo

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Vencedor do teste

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bom

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Bom

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bom

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bom

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recomendado

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Condicionalmente recomendada

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

100%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80.6%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 100%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 90%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 81%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 100%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 88%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 83%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 0%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

94%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

79.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 98%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 84%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 85%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 61%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 98%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 90%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 89%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 100%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 87%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

97%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

87%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

77.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 81%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 98%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

100%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

83%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

98%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

75%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

71%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70.9%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 98%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84.5%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%