Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Prémio

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Médio-alto

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Médio-alto

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Médio-alto

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Baixo custo

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Extremamente positivo

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Bom

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfatório

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfatório

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfatório

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Bom

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bom

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfatório

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfatório

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 Condicionalmente recomendada

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

54%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

82%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74.4%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

72%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

69%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

66%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

56%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

48%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%