Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Prémio

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Médio-alto

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Baixo custo

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Extremamente positivo

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Bom

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfatório

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Bom

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bom

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfatório

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

66%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

56%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%