Comparação: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Médio-alto

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Médio-alto

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Baixo custo

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Extremamente positivo

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfatório

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfatório

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bom

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfatório

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Condicionalmente recomendada

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

54%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

76%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

72%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

66%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

48%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%