Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Prémio

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Médio-alto

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Médio-alto

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Baixo custo

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Extremamente positivo

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Extremamente positivo

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfatório

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfatório

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Bom

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bom

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfatório

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfatório

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

86%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 78%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 79%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 79%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 70%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 69%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

93%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 81%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%