• 4 lojas, 0 produtos

Comparação: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Comparação de desempenho

Média de 2 testes

Desempenho em piso molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
70%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
75%
Vredestein
Wintrac Pro
Frenagem úmida
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
71%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
94%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
94%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
93%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
79%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
58%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
94%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
77%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
74%
Desempenho em piso seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
81%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
70%
Vredestein
Wintrac Pro
Travagem a seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
75%
Manuseamento a seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
84%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
65%
Dry lane change
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
75%
Reação da direção em piso seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
65%
Melhor na categoria: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV (93.8%)
Desempenho na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
77%
Vredestein
Wintrac Pro
Travagem de neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
70%
Tracção na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
82%
Manipulação da neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
80%
Melhor na categoria: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV (100.0%)
Conforto e ruído
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
74%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
69%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
74%
Vredestein
Wintrac Pro
Ruído externo
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
76%
Conforto ao rodar
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
71%
Melhor: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 (90.0%)
Melhor na categoria: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV (100.0%)
Economia
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
68%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
86%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
96%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
72%
Vredestein
Wintrac Pro
Resistência ao rolamento
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
96%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
72%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Carregando...

Contribuir para a comparação