Comparação: Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1. Michelin e.Primacy Prémio

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Prémio

3. Firestone Roadhawk Médio-alto

4. Nokian WetProof Médio-alto

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Baixo custo

1. Firestone Roadhawk 161

2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 161

3. Michelin e.Primacy 111

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

5. Nokian WetProof 47

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. Nokian WetProof 14x

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 8x

5. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 8.

1. Nokian WetProof 17.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 46.

1. Nokian WetProof 5.64

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

3. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

4. Michelin e.Primacy 12

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38

1. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 2023

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

5. Nokian WetProof 2023

1. Nokian WetProof Altamente recomendável

2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplar

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Exemplar

4. Michelin e.Primacy Extremamente positivo

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Bom

1. Nokian WetProof Recomendado

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Satisfatório

3. Firestone Roadhawk Condicionalmente recomendada

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Condicionalmente recomendada

5. Michelin e.Primacy Suficiente

Nokian
WetProof

83%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Firestone
Roadhawk

71%

Michelin
e.Primacy

61%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

60%

1. Nokian WetProof 81%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 69%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Nokian WetProof 85%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. Nokian WetProof 72%

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 64%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 58%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Nokian WetProof A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. Firestone Roadhawk A

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM B

5. Michelin e.Primacy B

Firestone
Roadhawk

84%

Nokian
WetProof

80%

Michelin
e.Primacy

71%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

61%

1. Nokian WetProof 87%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 63%

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 57%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

2. Nokian WetProof 80%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 80%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 68%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Michelin
e.Primacy

84%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

81%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

Nokian
WetProof

58%

1. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 90%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 67%

5. Nokian WetProof 61%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 72%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

5. Nokian WetProof 56%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM C

4. Firestone Roadhawk C

5. Nokian WetProof C

Nokian
WetProof

86%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin
e.Primacy

70%

Firestone
Roadhawk

62%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

61%

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 61%

1. Nokian WetProof ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

3. Michelin e.Primacy ?

4. Firestone Roadhawk ?

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM ?