Comparação: Nexen CP672 A vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Prémio

2. Vredestein ULTRAC Prémio

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Médio-alto

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Médio-alto

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Vredestein ULTRAC Altamente recomendável

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplar

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplar

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Bom

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Bom

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Bom

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Ainda recomendado

4. Vredestein ULTRAC Suficiente

5. Nexen CP672 A ?