4 lojas, 0 produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Tabela de conteúdos:

Resumo
Molhado
Seco
Custos
Testes mútuos
Comprar %

#	Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance /38%	Hankook Ventus Prime 4 /72%	Nokian WetProof /59%	Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 /78%

Dimensões	R14 - R20	R13 - R23	R14 - R20	R15 - R20
Preço	Definir dimensão para ver preços	Definir dimensão para ver preços	Definir dimensão para ver preços	Definir dimensão para ver preços
Remover	Retirar da comparação	Retirar da comparação	Retirar da comparação	Retirar da comparação

Segmento

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Prémio

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Prémio

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Prémio

4. Nokian WetProof Médio-alto

Número de tamanhos disponíveis

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Nokian WetProof 47

Número de testes

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

3. Nokian WetProof 14x

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

Melhor posição no teste

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

Pior posição no teste

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

3. Nokian WetProof 17.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

Posição média nos testes

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

2. Nokian WetProof 5.64

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

Ano do último teste

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

4. Nokian WetProof 2023

Melhor classificação no teste

1. Nokian WetProof Altamente recomendável

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Exemplar

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplar

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Exemplar

Pior classificação no teste

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Bom

2. Nokian WetProof Recomendado

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recomendado

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Satisfatório

Molhado

(Classificação geral)

Nokian
WetProof

82%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

73%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Nokian WetProof 72%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 59%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. Nokian WetProof 81%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 86%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 77%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

Curva em círculo molhado

1. Nokian WetProof 91%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 80%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 81%

Frenagem úmida

1. Nokian WetProof 85%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 76%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 76%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

Guia lateral húmida

1. Nokian WetProof 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 67%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Travagem em piso molhado de acordo com a etiqueta da ue

1. Nokian WetProof A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

Seco

(Classificação geral)

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

81%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

80%

Nokian
WetProof

75%

Manuseamento a seco

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 93%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 79%

3. Nokian WetProof 80%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

Travagem a seco

1. Nokian WetProof 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 83%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

Comportamento em condução seca

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83%

2. Nokian WetProof 71%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

Mudança de faixa seca

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 81%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 78%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Conforto

(Classificação geral)

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Nokian
WetProof

75%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

75%

Ruído exterior

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 75%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

Ruído interior

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 73%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 71%

4. Nokian WetProof 69%

Conforto

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 66%

4. Nokian WetProof 53%

Ruído exterior que acede ao rótulo UE

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

4. Nokian WetProof ?

Custos

(Classificação geral)

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

95%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

79%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

65%

Nokian
WetProof

60%

Resistência ao rolamento

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

4. Nokian WetProof 61%

Quilometragem

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 70%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 64%

4. Nokian WetProof 56%

Preço/valor

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 90%

3. Nokian WetProof 46%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 23%

Consumo de combustível de acordo com a etiqueta da ue

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

4. Nokian WetProof C

Contribuir para a comparação

Fazer

Modelo

Mutual tests available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Testes mútuos

Autoklub ČR Teste de pneu de verão 2023 205/55 R16

Nome	Total de pontos	Molhado	Seco
Melhores valores em teste	104,7	106	103,4
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance	101,2	100,7	101,7
Hankook Ventus Prime 4	101	100,6	101,4
Nokian WetProof	101,3	102,2	100,4
Mostrar detalhes do teste

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Contribuir para a comparação

Contribuir para a comparação

Mutual tests available

Testes mútuos

Verão

Classificações

Testes

Marcas

Classificações

Testes

Marcas

Inverno

Classificações

Testes

Marcas

Classificações

Testes

Marcas

Allround

Classificações

Testes

Marcas

Classificações

Testes

Marcas