• 4 lojas, 0 produtos

Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em piso molhado
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin Primacy 4+
60%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Frenagem úmida
Goodride Solmax 1
35%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
83%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
Melhor: Hankook iON Evo (97.0%)
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
67%
Falken e.Ziex
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
75%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%
Melhor: Hankook iON Evo (92.0%)
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodride Solmax 1
46%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
77%
Melhor: Hankook iON Evo (92.0%)
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Goodride Solmax 1
53%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
46%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
100%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
96%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Melhor na categoria: Hankook iON Evo (89.0%)
Desempenho em piso seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken e.Ziex
70%
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Travagem a seco
Goodride Solmax 1
56%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
Melhor: Hankook iON Evo (91.0%)
Manuseamento a seco
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
67%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%
Melhor: Hankook iON Evo (92.0%)
Melhor na categoria: Hankook iON Evo (91.5%)
Conforto e ruído
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental PremiumContact 7
57%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin Primacy 4+
66%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone Roadhawk 2
57%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Ruído externo
Goodride Solmax 1
76%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
57%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
57%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%
Economia
Hankook ION Evo
76%
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone Roadhawk 2
49%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
51%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Melhor: Falken E.Ziex (96.0%)
Quilometragem
Goodride Solmax 1
45%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
45%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Carregando...

Contribuir para a comparação