4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
3
4
4
18
1
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
1.3
12.0
3.3
6.1
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2026
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
23
111
40
47
66

Molhado

Molhado
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Frenagem úmida
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação