4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Nokian WetProof vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Perfil do teste

Nokian
WetProof
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Número de testes
14
4
18
1
6
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#1
#1
#3
Posição média
5.6
3.3
6.1
1.0
4.7
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2024
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
40
47
27
146

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Nokian WetProof
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian WetProof
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian WetProof
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian WetProof
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian WetProof
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Guia lateral húmida
Nokian WetProof
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Seco
Nokian WetProof
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Nokian WetProof
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian WetProof
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Mudança de faixa seca
Nokian WetProof
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Conforto
Nokian WetProof
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Ruído exterior
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Conforto
Nokian WetProof
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Custos
Nokian WetProof
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian WetProof
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Quilometragem
Nokian WetProof
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store