4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Michelin
e.Primacy
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
4
14
5
18
4
Melhor posição
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
Posição média
12.0
3.6
2.8
6.1
3.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2026
2024
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
111
194
139
47
40

Molhado

Molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Guia lateral húmida
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Mudança de faixa seca
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Resposta da direcção seca
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Conforto

Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Custos

Custos
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação