4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
10
11
14
4
4
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#8
#2
#2
Posição média
6.0
11.6
13.4
3.3
3.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
109
122
153
40
40

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Desempenho em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Seco

Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Custos

Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store