4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
10
18
4
4
1
Melhor posição
#3
#2
#1
#3
#2
#1
Posição média
5.5
6.0
6.1
12.0
3.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
109
47
111
40
66

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação