4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
11
4
18
1
Melhor posição
#3
#1
#3
#1
#1
Posição média
5.5
11.6
12.0
6.1
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2024
2025
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
122
111
47
66

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação