4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Número de testes
18
4
2
3
14
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#1
#4
#1
Posição média
6.1
3.3
2.0
4.3
3.6
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
40
48
99
194

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação