4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
21
18
3
13
4
3
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Posição média
11.9
6.1
3.7
4.3
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
165
47
36
123
40
36

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação