4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Número de testes
21
18
36
10
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#1
#2
Posição média
11.9
6.1
3.1
6.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2023
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
165
47
303
109

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Desempenho em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Desempenho em piso seco
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Eficiência de combustível
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Testes mútuos

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
ADACADAC
Verão
2023205/55 R16Ver

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store