4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Prinx XLAB Comfort EV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Prinx
XLAB Comfort EV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
3
1
18
3
4
Melhor posição
#1
#7
#1
#2
#2
Posição média
1.3
7.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
23
47
36
40

Molhado

Molhado
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Frenagem úmida
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
37%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Guia lateral húmida
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Seco

Seco
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Mudança de faixa seca
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Custos

Custos
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação