4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Nokian
WetProof
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
14
21
4
3
1
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Posição média
5.6
11.9
3.3
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2024
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
165
40
36
66

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Nokian WetProof
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian WetProof
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian WetProof
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian WetProof
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian WetProof
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Nokian WetProof
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
Nokian WetProof
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Comportamento em condução seca
Nokian WetProof
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Resposta da direcção seca
Nokian WetProof
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Conforto
Nokian WetProof
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Ruído interior
Nokian WetProof
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Custos
Nokian WetProof
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian WetProof
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Nokian WetProof
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Nokian WetProof
46%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store