4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
3
13
18
4
28
Melhor posição
#6
#1
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
9.0
4.3
6.1
3.3
2.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
91
123
47
40
67

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seco
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Travagem a seco
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Mudança de faixa seca
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Conforto
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Conforto
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Custos
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Quilometragem
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Michelin Primacy 4+
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store