4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
3
18
3
1
4
Melhor posição
#6
#1
#2
#1
#2
Posição média
9.0
6.1
3.7
1.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
91
47
36
66
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seco
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Mudança de faixa seca
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Custos
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Conforto
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store