4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Nokian Line SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Nokian
Line SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
5
18
6
1
4
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#3
#1
#2
Posição média
4.2
6.1
4.7
1.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2017
2024
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
33
47
146
66
40

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Seco
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Travagem a seco
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Custos
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Conforto
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store