4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Perfil do teste

Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
4
3
4
3
24
Melhor posição
#3
#4
#2
#2
#1
Posição média
12.0
4.3
3.3
3.7
2.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
111
99
40
36
302

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Guia lateral húmida
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Travagem a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Resposta da direcção seca
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Mudança de faixa seca
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Ruído exterior
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Custos
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Quilometragem
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store