4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
4
1
3
3
4
4
Melhor posição
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
Posição média
12.0
1.0
1.3
3.7
3.3
3.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
111
66
23
36
40
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Guia lateral húmida
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Resposta da direcção seca
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mudança de faixa seca
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Custos
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store