4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
4
4
18
28
5
1
Melhor posição
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Posição média
12.0
3.3
6.1
2.3
2.2
1.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
111
40
47
67
63
66

Molhado

Molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Conforto

Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Custos

Custos
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação