4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
4
4
17
23
3
Melhor posição
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Posição média
12.0
3.3
1.7
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
111
40
80
176
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Resposta da direcção seca
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Mudança de faixa seca
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Custos
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store