4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
4
21
18
1
28
Melhor posição
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
Posição média
12.0
11.9
6.1
1.0
2.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2024
2024
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
111
165
47
66
68

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Confidence
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Guia lateral húmida
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seco
Confidence
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Travagem a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Mudança de faixa seca
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Resposta da direcção seca
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Conforto
Confidence
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Custos
Confidence
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Quilometragem
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store