4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Perfil do teste

Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Número de testes
4
3
4
23
29
Melhor posição
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
12.0
3.7
3.3
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
111
36
40
176
180

Molhado

Molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Guia lateral húmida
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%

Seco

Seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Travagem a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Mudança de faixa seca
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%

Conforto

Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Ruído exterior
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%

Custos

Custos
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Quilometragem
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação