4 lojas · 0+ produtos
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Kumho Ecsta HS52Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Prémio
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Comparar também com
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Perfil do teste

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Número de testes
10
23
4
3
14
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Posição média
6.0
3.3
3.3
3.7
3.6
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
109
176
40
36
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Desempenho em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Explorar rankings

Best tyres for evsMelhor manuseamento a seco pneusMelhor pneus de chuvaMelhor manuseio pneusPneus mais silenciosos Pneus mais económicos Melhores pneus anti-aquaplanagem

Comparações de pneus populares

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Compare também

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian WetproofGoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 PGoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Dunlop WINTERGoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Navegar por marca

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store