4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
10
18
3
1
4
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Posição média
6.0
6.1
3.7
1.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
109
47
36
66
40

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Conforto
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Seco
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Custos
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store