4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
10
21
18
4
28
Melhor posição
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
6.0
11.9
6.1
3.3
2.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2024
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
109
165
47
40
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store