4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
11
4
18
1
4
3
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Posição média
11.6
12.0
6.1
1.0
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
122
111
47
66
40
36

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Custos
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Quilometragem
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store