Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Médio-alto

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

Comparar também com

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Perfil do teste

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Número de testes

11

18

1

3

5

4

Melhor posição

#1

#2

#1

#2

Posição média

11.6

6.1

1.0

3.7

2.2

3.3

Teste mais recente

2024

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

122

47

27

36

63

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Frenagem úmida

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Curva em círculo molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Travagem a seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Manuseamento a seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Conforto

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Ruído exterior

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Conforto

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Custos

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Quilometragem

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Resistência ao rolamento

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Tread pattern comparison

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Explorar rankings

Best tyres for evs Melhor manuseamento a seco pneus Melhor pneus de chuva Melhor manuseio pneus Pneus mais silenciosos Pneus mais económicos Melhores pneus anti-aquaplanagem

Comparações de pneus populares

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Compare também

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Navegar por marca

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Tread pattern comparison

Dimensões e preços

Explorar rankings

Comparações de pneus populares

Compare também

Navegar por marca

Contribuir para a comparação