4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Perfil do teste

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Número de testes
11
18
4
3
2
14
Melhor posição
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
11.6
6.1
3.3
3.7
2.0
3.6
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
122
47
40
36
48
194

Molhado

Molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Frenagem úmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Guia lateral húmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%

Seco

Seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Travagem a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Manuseamento a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Conforto

Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Ruído exterior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Custos

Custos
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Quilometragem
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Preço/valor
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação