4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
11
18
16
4
1
Melhor posição
#1
#1
#3
#3
#1
Posição média
11.6
6.1
5.5
12.0
1.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2023
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
122
47
153
111
66

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Custos
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Quilometragem
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Preço/valor
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store