4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
11
18
16
1
3
Melhor posição
#1
#1
#3
#1
#2
Posição média
11.6
6.1
5.5
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2023
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
122
47
153
66
36

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Frenagem úmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Conforto
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Custos
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preço/valor
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store