4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
1
18
28
4
3
Melhor posição
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Posição média
1.0
6.1
2.3
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
66
47
68
40
36

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Confidence
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Frenagem úmida
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Custos
Confidence
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Quilometragem
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preço/valor
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Conforto
Confidence
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Seco
Confidence
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Tread pattern comparison

Hankook ION Evo
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store