4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
4
5
3
18
1
3
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
Posição média
3.3
4.8
3.7
6.1
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
158
36
47
66
36

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store