4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Número de testes
4
4
18
6
1
5
Melhor posição
#2
#3
#1
#3
#1
#1
Posição média
3.3
12.0
6.1
4.7
1.0
2.2
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
111
47
146
66
63

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação