4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
4
4
28
18
1
Melhor posição
#2
#3
#1
#1
#1
Posição média
3.3
12.0
2.3
6.1
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2026
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
111
67
47
66

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação