4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Número de testes
4
5
23
3
14
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
3.3
2.8
3.3
3.7
3.6
Teste mais recente
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
139
176
36
194

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação