4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
4
18
1
5
28
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Posição média
3.3
6.1
1.0
2.8
2.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
47
27
139
68

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store