4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
4
18
29
3
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#1
#2
Posição média
3.3
6.1
3.7
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
47
180
36

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store