4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
4
6
1
3
28
Melhor posição
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
3.3
4.7
1.0
3.7
2.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
146
27
36
68

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store