4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
4
29
23
3
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#1
#2
Posição média
3.3
3.7
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
180
176
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store