4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
4
28
4
3
4
1
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
Posição média
3.3
2.3
12.0
3.7
3.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
67
111
36
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store