4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Número de testes
4
49
3
3
5
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#4
#2
#1
Posição média
3.3
3.2
4.3
3.7
2.2
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
213
99
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Comportamento em condução seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store